I restrict myself here in discussion on the Engel’s dialectics of nature, to two chapters of his book, which has the following nine articles, in which the 80% of the content is evolved in and around the science subjects, through which the dialectics of both living and non-living objects had been discussed and tried to apply the principles of sciences in mixture in both scientific and in philosophical manner to convince the readers of all fields globally
1) Introduction
2) Dialectics
3) Fundamental form of motion
four) Measure of motion- work
5) Heat
6) Electricity
7) Tidal friction-Kant and Thomson-trait on the rotation of the earth and lunar attraction
Component played by labour in transition from ape to man
9) Natural science and spirit world.
.Of course it had been succeeded in neglecting the human-based humanities, by leaving most of the other sciences of his time out of its fold due to unknown reasons. This book could not be seen in the world without having Karl Marx without whom Engel’s identification could not noticed separately as he himself claimed numerous times
.
In my previous writing,’ why did Frederick Engel deviate from the concept of Karl Marx on dialectics of nature? In which, I described the doctors’ actual story in some remote
Village was only to claim that the subject professional has only locus standi in modern days from whom the people in typical want to understand a lot more in his related observations only. Engle was genuinely a science student and his strong association with the scientists
Was not a secret and open to all those who had been familiar with his contributions in helping Karl Marx at that time.
Actually the dialectics of nature, a set of articles was incomplete form in the life time of both Karl Marx and Frederic Engel. Significantly later it had been brought out in German in English languages, in 1925. Karl Marx had some little difference on the foundational prepositions from the ‘foreign’ elements in these articles to get support of the claim what Engel had in mind at that time
. In fact he had a thought to write a total book on science with his findings in comparison with the other contemporaries as 1 of the equals, but it was regrettably not possible for an unmatchable pair of world who has contributed a lot to the poor as a light in the hands to live with dignity and respect.
I factor why does not all the acts of the same people not doable in the most similar way in all repeated acts, if they have been asked to repeat in the identical conditions and in same scenario with out change of any connected objects for the practical purposes to form an thought about how does human behaviors and social sciences or in other word if anybody ask the validity to add the term ‘science’ to the humanities, are differed from the every from its minor branches besides its primary branches of the divisions of the subjects, viz physical sciences, biological sciences and humanities without having moving further into its branches and sub-branches in depth. For simple answers to the following questions what I like to say that all the answers really relevant to bifurcate the subjects discussed in the dialectics of nature into two primary branches for the living and non-living primarily
.
1) Can anybody hit all sixes in 12 balls at least?
2) Can any great spinner make all the team out continuously in two or in three over?
three) Can any man sign on the paper in the same way without any difference?
four) Why does not of them take the wounded persons to hospital in any accident from the spot?
5) Why does not get all convicted in all the circumstances booked by the police in any state?
6) Why does not vote the whole citizen to one candidate in any democratic state in the world?
7) Why did warren buffet and bill gates contributed all his assets in past?
What was the will need of Osama bin laden to leave his wealthiest life and why did he engage in war games with the mighty forces of America and its allied forces
9) Why was Saddam Hussein uncompromised with his stand against the American forces and lost his life,along with thousands of thousands of people from both sides?
10) Why 1.five million Cambodians were lost their lives in the war.
Although answering to all these questions, the mind would go towards the humans only but not towards non-living issues in nature. Due to the fact they are number of contradictions in the human society. The very first of its kind was the man and the nature. The nature has its own contradictions with all of its elements which play a key role in molding it into further developments. In the nature, important players are, fire, water, forest, terrain, temperature, and rain falls
.On the other side, wild animals, poisonous insects, and friendly animals form an additional part. The humans and their origin with descendents, development, have one more part. Each of the part with its branches such as its components and players would by no means play one more component as a set flexible to merge into its all rules. In essence where the players of the particular field it have its own set of laws and its principles for the distinct acts to play inside its circle. Where the players are diverse the rules and laws also differ from the earlier field.
Hence the principles of the physics and chemistry do not constitute a single set of laws. At the very same time, biology, astronomy and mathematics do not constitute a single set of law simply because its players are various and their rules are various from other branch of laws. In single set of the planetary laws the humans have the predominant role in molding the nature in changing the conditions like global warming and alter of climate
. The consequences and influences of the acts of the humans in consolidations either throgh the men or through the machinery the conditions of the globe are changing. To change the laws of any branch it has the role of the players inside if I say in computer’s languag the distinct software for a specific work is applicable and applied. No other software is allowed to perform the distinct function in windows only
The present soft-wares are developed by 1 or two individuals with their sound information on the subjects and they felt that these soft wares are useful for generating income in the global market either via their organizations or through themselves only.
On the other side, the computers were invented and developed for the convenience of the peoples’ works. So that they invented and developed all these beneficial soft wares for the global marketplace as well as for them selves also.. Here one more question, Charles Babbage whose thought was behind invention of the computer, and the exact same idea was materialized via, correct Eckert & Mauchly. Now most of the individuals are using the computers in the globe. And it looks in the world that the computers are doing every single function and the humans are the next and have been guiding by the computers
. From a distant look on the human-personal computer relations, it is common to comprehend that the humans are depended on the computers and the computers are the guiding force to humans. And those who are in writing the history of the present society in future really would write in such a way what they saw from out side. Just like the case of Engel’s writings on dialectics of nature. As a matter of invention and writing a new factor about the present society it is widespread to write about the past which correspond to the visible elements to their logical conclusions, they only think and write
.
The simple and important problem in the name of Marxism, the dialectics of nature, if it is component of Marxism, upon which the whole structure is raised by other contributors for the development of Marxism, by Lenin, and right after Moa. But all these contributions do not form 1 only in the name of Marxism, but all these isms have risen on the exact same structure of the philosophization in one form such as all subjects and its contributors.
Following is the set of laws, Engel got from the writings of Hegel, and described about its functioning in his book.
“It is as a result, from the history of nature and human society that the laws of dialectics are distracted. For they are nothing but the most general laws, of these two aspects of historical development, as well as the thought itself and indeed they can be reduced in the principal to three.
1) The law of transformation
2) The law of interpretation
3) The law of negation of the negation’
These laws essentially extracted from the writings of Hegel and how had been applied to the dialectics of nature has been described in detail all. Here I take the reference where the human laws are described with comparison of other physical and biological and other subjects I add the argument with clarity of relevancy to disassociate the human laws from the laws of non-living issues in the nature. At the identical time, no 1 ought to have any objection for the description of the laws of all science and where as the laws of humans and human natures are discussed,it is the duty of each one to dislocate the laws of humans from the list of laws of all science in the interest of the broad human societies which are badly damaged by believing that the human laws are very scientific and based on science that will save the human society for peace and prosperity in the universal law of brotherhood with all respects, guaranteed by the charters of the human rights. Here is the following assertions on the subjects what he had mixed with each and every other for preparing a universal set of common laws for both human non-human issues on the name of dialectics of nature
.
“But to have formulated for the initial time in its universally valid a general law of development of nature, society and thought, will often remain an act of historical significance. And these gentlemen have for years caused quantity and quality to be transformed into 1 an additional, without having realizing what they did, and then they will have to consol themselves with Moliere’s Monsier Jourdain, who had not spoken prose all his life without having slightest inking of it”
It is fairly clear that Engel has claimed that these laws are general laws of the development of the nature, society, and thought and he interpreted in his lengthiest assertions brought from all the sciences with the names of those formulators of his understanding.
in his post, ‘basic form of motion’ he has taken the Descartes’ principle, Helmhotlz’s law of conservation of force, Kant’s law and Kant-Lap-lace theory of cosmology in forwarding his laws for the humans along with his laws of sciences
.
It could be understood that the “dialectics has proved from the results of our experience of nature so far all polar opposite in general are determined by mutual action of the two opposite poles on one another, that the separation and opposition of these poles exists only with their unity and inter connection, and conversely that their interconnection exists only in their separation and their unity in opposition’. This shows that the two opposite’s mutual connection and inside the unity in their opposition is directly intended to the society and the folks in all communist parties in the world. This sort of direct application to the society by the concerned communist parties in the world in really mechanical manner is one the fundamental historical blunders what I comprehend about this Engel’s dialectics of nature had to be corrected and applied in the way of human based philosophy of Marxism in spite of non-living issues based Marxian philosophy of physical, biological, chemical, mathematical, astronomical and non-living things oriented philosophy forwarded by Engel’s dialectics of nature.